Cognitive Dissonance

"Democracy! Bah! When I hear that I reach for my feather boa!" - Allen Ginsberg

43 notes

Juan Williams and Newt Gingrich face off

Juan Williams asked Newt Gingrich in tonight’s debate about his comments regarding Black Americans demanding paychecks and not food stamps, plus his statements about poor children working as janitors in their schools and firing unionized janitorial labor. Gingrich attempted to make his case by doubling-down on each idea. 

This whole exchange was utterly offensive on Gingrich’s part and was compounded by the audience booing Williams for asking the question. Here’s the full back-and-forth - it really must be read to be believed:

WILLIAMS: Speaker Gingrich, you recently said black Americans should demand jobs, not food stamps. You also said poor kids lack a strong work ethic and proposed having them work as janitors in their schools. Can’t you see that this is viewed, at a minimum, as insulting to all Americans, but particularly to black Americans?

GINGRICH: No. I don’t see that.
You know, my daughter, Jackie, who’s sitting back there, Jackie Cushman, reminded me that her first job was at First Baptist Church in Carrollton, Georgia, doing janitorial work at 13. And she liked earning the money. She liked learning that if you worked, you got paid. She liked being in charge of her own money, and she thought it was a good start.

I had a young man in New Hampshire who walked up to me. I’ve written two newsletters now about this topic. I’ve had over 50 people write me about the jobs they got at 11, 12, 13 years of age. Ran into a young man who started a doughnut company at 11. He’s now 16. He has several restaurants that take his doughnuts. His father is thrilled that he’s 16 because he can now deliver his own doughnuts.

What I tried to say — and I think it’s fascinating, because Joe Klein reminded me that this started with an article he wrote 20 years ago. New York City pays their janitors an absurd amount of money because of the union. You could take one janitor and hire 30-some kids to work in the school for the price of one janitor, and those 30 kids would be a lot less likely to drop out. They would actually have money in their pocket. They’d learn to show up for work. They could do light janitorial duty. They could work in the cafeteria. They could work in the front office. They could work in the library. They’d be getting money, which is a good thing if you’re poor. Only the elites despise earning money.

WILLIAMS: The suggestion that he made was about a lack of work ethic. And I’ve got to tell you, my e-mail account, my Twitter account has been inundated with people of all races who are asking if your comments are not intended to belittle the poor and racial minorities. You saw some of this reaction during your visit…
… to a black church in South Carolina. You saw some of this during your visit to a black church in South Carolina, where a woman asked you why you refer to President Obama as “the food stamp president.” It sounds as if you are seeking to belittle people.

GINGRICH: Well, first of all, Juan, the fact is that more people have been put on food stamps by Barack Obama than any president in American history.
Now, I know among the politically correct, you’re not supposed to use facts that are uncomfortable.

Second, you’re the one who earlier raised a key point. There’s — the area that ought to be I-73 was called by Barack Obama a corridor of shame because of unemployment. Has it improved in three years? No. They haven’t built the road. They haven’t helped the people. They haven’t done anything.
BRET BAIER: Finish your thought, Mr. Speaker.

GINGRICH: One last thing.

BAIER: Yes, sir.

GINGRICH: So here’s my point. I believe every American of every background has been endowed by their creator with the right to pursue happiness. And if that makes liberals unhappy, I’m going to continue to find ways to help poor people learn how to get a job, learn how to get a better job and learn some day to own the job.

(Source: cognitivedissonance)

Filed under Newt Gingrich Racism Classism Juan Williams politics South Carolina GOP debate GOP Republican Republicans offensive

  1. undercalicoskies reblogged this from cognitivedissonance and added:
    I just got around to reading Newt’s specific comments, and I want to throw up. I’m not sure whether to be more appalled...
  2. redvelvetcupcakes21 reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  3. andimthedad said: Never mind that there are more white people on welfare than any other race.
  4. sleepyempress reblogged this from cognitivedissonance and added:
    I heard this unfold live, and I still can’t believe it. Bad Newt.
  5. paulineerika reblogged this from cognitivedissonance and added:
    ugh. how can he even be taken seriously??
  6. nomoretexasgovernorsforpresident said: God - I wish I could reach out and punch Newt in his smug, ugly face!
  7. generalbriefing reblogged this from cognitivedissonance and added:
    First, booing the black guy for asking a legitimate question is straight up bullshit, but really. Did you expect...
  8. jsenum said: Think of the poor and middle classes of this country as a women in the final throes of a deadly cancer married to Newt. Do we really want Newt as the person with the power to “pull our plug?” and jump into the arms of his rich mistress?
  9. ajwatchdc reblogged this from cognitivedissonance and added:
    Gingrich doubles down. What else would he do?
  10. sinidentidades reblogged this from cognitivedissonance and added:
    Juan Williams asked Newt Gingrich in tonight’s debate about his comments regarding Black Americans demanding paychecks...
  11. nomoretexasgovernorsforpresident reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  12. contextual-awareness reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  13. fearandwar reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  14. cognitivedissonance posted this