Cognitive Dissonance

"Democracy! Bah! When I hear that I reach for my feather boa!" - Allen Ginsberg

39 notes

Reality, Meet Romney: Mitt Romney Claims that the Aurora Theater Shooter Obtained His Weapons Illegally, When All Were Bought Legally!!!


Mitt Romney revealed that he is unfamiliar with the details of the largest mass shooting in American history, during an interview with NBC’s Brian Williams. The former Massachusetts governor claimed that the alleged gunman in the Aurora, Colorado massacre illegally obtained his weapons, when in fact he legally purchased the firearms through various national gun chains.

According to a transcript of an interview that will air Wednesday night on NBC Nightly News, the presidential candidate said “it was illegal for him to have many of those [weapons] already,” and suggested that stronger gun laws would not have prevented the tragedy. Instead, Romney claimed that the way to deal with such senseless violence is by “changing the heart of the American people”:

ROMNEY: Well this person shouldn’t have had any kind of weapons and bombs and other devices and it was illegal for him to have many of those things already. But he had them. And so we can sometimes hope that just changing the law will make all bad things go away. It won’t. Changing the heart of the American people may well be what’s essential, to improve the lots of the American people.

In fact, the 24-year-old legally purchased every firearm, bullet, and piece of tactical gear that he used for the attack, according to local law enforcement. He bought most of it over the Internet. Mentally ill people are barred from purchasing firearms, but he had no previous record of illness, and would not have been flagged in a background check.

Unfortunately, rather than addressing the inadequacies of the nation’s existing gun laws, Romney instead focused on “changing the heart of the American people” and successfully dodged the larger conversation about gun control.

Successfully dodged? Maybe in that interview…

What Mitt meant to say was that it SHOULD be illegal for the shooter to obtain those weapons. Retroactively.


So I can assume Mittens is gonna push to make that happen? Or was he just saying words without thinking again?

(Source: thepoliticalfreakshow)

  1. kelseyofcake reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  2. phoenixfire72 reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  3. drst reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  4. twopillske reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  5. careful-with-that-blog-eugene reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  6. treecyclops reblogged this from cognitivedissonance and added:
    What is shocking is that a presidential candidate doesn’t appear to know the most basic details of a significant current...
  7. sum-quod-eris reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  8. lisalisaluvchild reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  9. questionall reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  10. randomactsofchaos reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  11. contentment-of-cats reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  12. batcountryword reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  13. cognitivedissonance reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow and added:
    Successfully dodged? Maybe in that interview…What Mitt meant to say was that it SHOULD be illegal for the shooter to...
  14. thepoliticalfreakshow posted this