Cognitive Dissonance

"Democracy! Bah! When I hear that I reach for my feather boa!" - Allen Ginsberg

Posts tagged Dana Loesch

352 notes

I’m a black Jew at a Nazi-Klan rally, and there are some power-abusing corrupt monsters in our federal government that despise me because I have the audacity to speak the truth…

Ted Nugent, justifying remarks which have earned him an investigation from the Secret Service.

Dear Ted Nugent,

Things you are not:

  • Black
  • A Jew

Things you could be:

  • At a Nazi rally
  • At a Klan rally

Things you don’t have:

  • The truth
  • Anything close to it

Things you do have:

  • Audacity
  • People who despise you
  • Lots and lots of angry white male privilege

That should clear up some of the confusion, you unbelievable asshole. 

Cheers!

- Meg

Filed under Ted Nugent seriously?! politics racism race things that you are not republican conservative threats bigotry wow fuckery of the highest accord GOP Election Dana Loesch you are not oppressed

126 notes

War on uteri, criminal defense, and government-mandated prostate poking

Rick Santorum thinks Woodstock and the Democratic Party are pretty much the same thing, thereby proving he has no idea what either entails.

Seriously:

"Woodstock is the great American orgy. This is who the Democratic Party has become. They have become the party of Woodstock. The prey upon our most basic primal lusts, and that’s sex. And the whole abortion culture, it’s not about life. It’s about sexual freedom. That’s what it’s about. Homosexuality. It’s about sexual freedom."

— Rick Santorum discussing the Democratic Party at a 2008 forum, “Press & People of Faith in Politics.”

Yep.

And I’m not shocked by this statement, particularly in the context of current politics.

I’m sure folks have heard of the “Hey, now the state can rape you” bill, a.k.a. the Virginia ultrasound bill. Essentially, this bill mandates an ultrasound before an abortion, and if it is too early in pregnancy, a trans-vaginal ultrasound must be performed. A picture is worth a thousand words. This procedure is medically unnecessary and is being demanded under the guise of those seeking abortions having “all the information” about what they’re about to undergo.

Apparently, medical professionals are no longer the best sources of said information and must be ordered by the state to provide invasive medical procedures BECAUSE THAT’S NOT BIG GOVERNMENT AT ALL. This is only small government if the definition has switched to government small enough to fit in my uterus.

Justifications provided by the bill’s defenders include women had already made the decision to be “vaginally penetrated when they got pregnant.” Therefore, Del. Kathy J. Byron, is justified in insisting, “if we want to talk about invasiveness, there’s nothing more invasive than the procedure that she is about to have.”

Though nothing infuriated me more than this gem from CNN’s Dana Loesch:

"That’s the big thing that progressives are trying to say, that it’s rape and so on and so forth. […] There were individuals saying, "Oh what about the Virginia rape? The rapes that, the forced rapes of women who are pregnant?" What? Wait a minute, they had no problem having similar to a trans-vaginal procedure when they engaged in the act that resulted in their pregnancy."

Really? You determined that yourself? No one in the history of ever was coerced into sex? And then got pregnant? 

Yeah… no. And guess what? Consenting to sex does not equal consenting to pregnancy and your vagina becoming property of the state to be poked and prodded. Ever heard the “Well, she IS a slut…” - or something similar - justification for rape? This is pretty goddamn close. Once you’ve consented to someone probing your vagina once, you’ve clearly consented to all penises and objects. 

I propose a new criminal defense strategy. Let’s call it the Loesch-Virginia defense. It works like this:

Defendant: “Your honor, I could not have possibly raped the woman in question. Clearly, she has consented to a pseudo trans-vaginal procedure and is a notorious whore. It’s HER fault for carrying that baby around town and advertising her own promiscuity. It’s not my fault for acting on HER signals and assuming she wouldn’t mind being penetrated against her will. Therefore, I’m using the Loesch-Virginia defense.”

Judge: “I’ll allow it.”

All sarcasm aside, I’m proposing an amendment to the bill. Erectile dysfunction impacts millions of men each year. While its cause can be psychosomatic, it can also be a symptom of a much more serious medical problem. Millions of prescriptions for Viagra are written each year, often after little medical consultation. Now, I want men to have all the information before making such a significant decision — ingesting this drug can lead to irreversible vision loss and cardiac arrest.

Before prescribing this drug, I propose the state mandate doctors performing a digital rectal exam. This can check for an enlarged prostate, a common cause of erectile dysfunction, even if the physician has ruled out that cause or the patient wishes to not undergo the procedure. Basically, if men want this:

They can deal with this:

Besides, I’m sure some men seeking this prescription have engaged in consensual anal play before, right? So it’s not a big deal, right? Riiiight… because it’s not actually about sex itself. 

It’s about moralistic preaching from a party of no ideas and a fractured base. It’s ginning up a war on the wimmenfolk to try to win an election. From Politico:

"I feel like the world is spinning backwards," said former Rep. Patricia Schroeder, who has often related the troubles she has as a young married law student getting her birth control prescriptions filled in the early 1960s. "If you had told me when I was in law school that this would be a debate in 2012, I would have thought you were nuts. And everyone I talk to thinks so, too."

Jennifer Lawless, director of the Women and Politics Institute at American University, also sees the chance of a huge female backlash if the Republicans overreach. “If women feel they are being targeted again, that women’s health is on the line — that’s not an argument you want to make in an election year,” she said.

Make no mistake - the war on contraception and abortion has nothing to do with religious liberty and information. It is about distraction - the policies put forth by the GOP in 2012 tanked the economy in 2008. The Democratic Party is not comprised of saints either. But really? A war on birth control?

For your convenience: Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)

And the GOP platform of A Handmaid’s Tale 2012 marches on… I have higher aspirations than being a brood mare for the state, thank you.

(Source: cognitivedissonance)

Filed under Rick Santorum Virginia Birth control politics reproductive rights war on uteri sarcasm viagra contraception seriously GOP Election Election 2012 Republican Democrats Dana Loesch Rape violence abortion pro-choice anti-choice gender