Cognitive Dissonance

"Democracy! Bah! When I hear that I reach for my feather boa!" - Allen Ginsberg

Posts tagged TSA

9 notes

This exists:

Airport security screenings now include the use of x-ray machines called “body scanners.” These are highly sophisticated devices which can see through your clothing. They are capable of creating a “nude” image of your private body parts, in revealing detail. At ScannerShirts.com we are sensitive to your desire to maintain your personal dignity consistent with safe air travel. As such we have designed the products below as privacy wear for family travel.

Our garments have been imprinted with a special ink which tests have shown will create an opaque blur to help keep the details of your private body parts, private. These items are intended to be worn beneath your normal outer clothing as comfortable undergarments of high quality at a reasonable price.

The youth tee is a tad creepy:

The market for his undergarments might be gone now that TSA is going to use generic outline images that don’t display your swimsuit area. Personally, I feel that when a market for products like this legitimately exists, maybe we’ve gone a little too far.

Filed under TSA airport airport security Shit that exists politics security privacy

51 notes

Well, it was only a matter of time, folks:

Alert: Terrorists look to implant bombs in humansBy EILEEN SULLIVAN  Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) - Airlines are being warned by the government that terrorists are considering surgically hiding bombs inside humans to evade airport security.
As a result, travelers may find themselves subjected to more scrutiny when flying in the heart of summer vacation season, especially to the U.S. from abroad.
The FBI and Homeland Security Department sent a memo to security officials around the country on Wednesday about “body packing,” describing it as a “criminal tactic with possible terrorist application.” …Bombs-in-the-body is not a new idea, but recent intelligence indicates a fresh interest in using this method. People-scanning machines in airports aren’t able to detect explosives hidden inside humans. 

Awesome. Every single time we come up with some new “security” idea, it’s only a matter of time before someone will figure out a way to beat it. The illustration I posted for this may be satirical, but at what point do we decide enough is enough? Are we going to see body checks to look for recent surgical scars? Strip searches? Cavity searches? 
Here’s some perspective:
Lifetime odds of causes of death
Heart Disease:  1-in-5
Cancer:  1-in-7
Stroke:  1-in-23
Accidental Injury:  1-in-36
Motor Vehicle Accident: 1-in-100
Intentional Self-harm (suicide): 1-in-121
Assault by Firearm:  1-in-325
Fire or Smoke:  1-in-1,116
Electrocution: 1-in-5,000
Drowning:  1-in-8,942
Falling off a ladder: 1-in-10,010
Air Travel Accident: 1-in-20,000
Flood: 1-in-30,000
Legal Execution:  1-in-58,618
Tornado: 1-in-60,000
Lightning Strike: 1-in-83,930
Terrorist Attack: 1-in-88,000
And skipping ahead:
Tsunami: 1-in-500,000
Fireworks Discharge:  1-in-615,488
So guns, cars, ladders, and the planes themselves are more likely to kill us than terrorists. Knowing that, how do we justify this:
  

Well, it was only a matter of time, folks:

Alert: Terrorists look to implant bombs in humans
By EILEEN SULLIVAN  
Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) - Airlines are being warned by the government that terrorists are considering surgically hiding bombs inside humans to evade airport security.

As a result, travelers may find themselves subjected to more scrutiny when flying in the heart of summer vacation season, especially to the U.S. from abroad.

The FBI and Homeland Security Department sent a memo to security officials around the country on Wednesday about “body packing,” describing it as a “criminal tactic with possible terrorist application.” 

Bombs-in-the-body is not a new idea, but recent intelligence indicates a fresh interest in using this method. People-scanning machines in airports aren’t able to detect explosives hidden inside humans. 

Awesome. Every single time we come up with some new “security” idea, it’s only a matter of time before someone will figure out a way to beat it. The illustration I posted for this may be satirical, but at what point do we decide enough is enough? Are we going to see body checks to look for recent surgical scars? Strip searches? Cavity searches? 

Here’s some perspective:

Lifetime odds of causes of death

  • Heart Disease:  1-in-5
  • Cancer:  1-in-7
  • Stroke:  1-in-23
  • Accidental Injury:  1-in-36
  • Motor Vehicle Accident: 1-in-100
  • Intentional Self-harm (suicide): 1-in-121
  • Assault by Firearm:  1-in-325
  • Fire or Smoke:  1-in-1,116
  • Electrocution: 1-in-5,000
  • Drowning:  1-in-8,942
  • Falling off a ladder: 1-in-10,010
  • Air Travel Accident: 1-in-20,000
  • Flood: 1-in-30,000
  • Legal Execution:  1-in-58,618
  • Tornado: 1-in-60,000
  • Lightning Strike: 1-in-83,930
  • Terrorist Attack: 1-in-88,000

And skipping ahead:

  • Tsunami: 1-in-500,000
  • Fireworks Discharge:  1-in-615,488

So guns, cars, ladders, and the planes themselves are more likely to kill us than terrorists. Knowing that, how do we justify this:

  

Filed under TSA politics terrorism security fear fear mongering airport airport security civil liberties searches not cool fuckery government homeland security

11 notes


A photo of two Transportation Security Administration agents doing a full pat down on a baby, approximately 8 months old, has gone viral.  It happened at the Kansas City International Airport.  A passenger captured the image on his cell phone. Since he tweeted the picture on Saturday, it has had more than 200,000 hits.  The photo shows the helpless baby being held up in the air by his mother while the TSA workers do their job. 

Yeah, I’d be pissed. Video here:

A photo of two Transportation Security Administration agents doing a full pat down on a baby, approximately 8 months old, has gone viral. It happened at the Kansas City International Airport. A passenger captured the image on his cell phone. Since he tweeted the picture on Saturday, it has had more than 200,000 hits. The photo shows the helpless baby being held up in the air by his mother while the TSA workers do their job. 

Yeah, I’d be pissed. Video here:

Filed under civil rights TSA

181 notes

cuntymint:

janedoe225:

supersoygrrrl:

bluebears:

idroolinmysleep:

Get’em conditioned early, that’s the trick.

Remember when we didn’t live in a police state?

Not really.

we always lived in a police state, harsh reality for most people of color and poor people.

Exactly. The degree to which you feel the pain of fascism in this society is contingent upon your privilege within it. 

I really feel a sense of loss for children who were very young on Sept. 11th and who have been born since. They never knew what it was like to not fear a specter and walk through an airport security line, shoes on and personal space intact. 

cuntymint:

janedoe225:

supersoygrrrl:

bluebears:

idroolinmysleep:

Get’em conditioned early, that’s the trick.

Remember when we didn’t live in a police state?

Not really.

we always lived in a police state, harsh reality for most people of color and poor people.

Exactly. The degree to which you feel the pain of fascism in this society is contingent upon your privilege within it. 

I really feel a sense of loss for children who were very young on Sept. 11th and who have been born since. They never knew what it was like to not fear a specter and walk through an airport security line, shoes on and personal space intact. 

(Source: thedailypatdown, via bubonickitten)

Filed under terrorism post 9/11 pre-9/11 children security liberty TSA For fuck's sake

5 notes

Defeating the Porno Scanners with Simple Pancake Shapes

The new, expensive backscatter x-ray scanners installed at airports have already been shown to be fairly worthless because they can’t stop a determined individual from smuggling contraband onto an airplane in a body cavity. But that’s not all; it appears the scanners can easily be defeated by a kitchen rolling pin and a roll of tape.

According to a new paper (PDF) in the Journal of Transportation Security by Leon Kaufman and Joseph W. Carlson (via Slashdot):

It is very likely that a large (15-20 cm in diameter), irregularly-shaped, cm-thick pancake with beveled edges, taped to the abdomen, would be invisible to this technology, ironically, because of its large volume, since it is easily confused with normal anatomy. Thus, a third of a kilo of PETN, easily picked up in a competent pat down, would be missed by backscatter “high technology”. Forty grams of PETN, a purportedly dangerous amount, would fit in a 1.25 mm-thick pancake of the dimensions simulated here and be virtually invisible. Packed in a compact mode, say, a 1 cm×4 cm×5 cm brick, it would be detected.

You read that right. What next? 

 
I can blow up airplanes! Yay! 

Filed under Airport Security Bombs Pancakes TSA porno fuckery politics government

45 notes

Full-body airport scanner flaws exposed

thefuror:

Click through for the rest of the article.

US scientists have found flaws in full-body airport scanners they say could let terrorists smuggle guns and explosives onto planes, renewing calls for authorities to consider using alternative screening devices.

Parts of the human body and other benign objects create “noise” that can interfere with the machine’s signals, the research published in the Journal of Transportation Security says.

While scanner operators may be able to spot some of the items, many others such could go unnoticed.

“They (the scanners) are ineffective for thin objects such as blades when they are aligned close to the beam direction,” the report says.

“An object such as a wire or a box-cutter blade, taped to the side of the body, or even a small gun in the same location, will be invisible.”

The study comes from leading University of California physicists Leon Kaufman and Joseph W. Carlson - who spearheaded the development of today’s medical imaging technology.

The authors even demonstrated how 40g of explosives could fit inside a “pancake” shape taped to the abdomen that would be “virtually invisible” to the technology.

They also studied a widely-published image of a woman using the device and found that a gun taped to her side is only visible because her arms are lowered next to it.

Travellers must raise their arms when going through the scanners - meaning the item would be invisible.

Oh, fantastic. Spending millions upon millions for something that doesn’t work and soothes fears of succumbing to an odds-defying event. Errorism at its best (worst).

(via recursiverecursion)

Filed under Terrorism errorism TSA Body scanners airport security fallacy

139 notes

Filed under: Yeah, this fucking happened.

This bombshell wearing just black lace, a pearl necklace and a white dog is Tammy Banovac, a retired surgeon in a wheelchair. She got down to her lingerie while going through airport security and still got a pat downTwice.

Dr. Banovac always refuses to go through the metal detector. She has to use a metal wheelchair and that means that she always gets a pat down no matter what. Lately, she says she feels violated because the pat downs have become increasingly invasive during the last few months. “If it happened anywhere else, it would have been sexual assault,” she declared to a local newspaper.

She was so angry with the situation that she decided to change things. On November 30, the 52-year-old arrived to the Will Rogers World Airport in Oklahoma City en route to Phoenix, wearing just a trench coat. When it was time to pass through the check point, she took off her coat, stripping down to her black lace lingerie. She hoped that, by showing that she had nothing to hide, she would not be hand-searched.

Sadly for her, things got worse: The perspicacious TSA agents wanted her to go through the metal detector, anyway. When she understandably refused, they decided to give her a pat down.

At this point, the quick-witted TSA agents said they found traces of nitrate on her body. Banovac claimed that it was probably her medication or a result of a hunting day. However, since it’s obvious that the retired surgeon could be a secret Al-Qaeda terrorist carrying a bomb somewhere in her lace bra or panties, the astute TSA officials subjected her to a one-hour hand-search and interrogation. Yes, one hour.

As a result, she missed her flight to Phoenix and had to return home. 

Yeah, I’m sure they found nitrate. Totally sure. Fucking disgusting. Unlike the masturbation at the Colorado airport story, this one’s real.

(Source: jezebel.com)

Filed under TSA Airport security Sick Disabilities Dr. Tammy Banovac Pat down enhanced pat down

21 notes

Glenn Beck's Alternative To The TSA: Let Everybody Carry A Gun

stfuglennbeck:

On his radio show today, Glenn Beck offered his alternative to the TSA. Texans with guns. Really. Beck said, “You think somebody’s gonna get up on a plane with a boxcutter… with a bunch of Texans?

Because Terrorists can’t get a hold of any guns.

Because we can trust people to shoot the terrorist and not a fellow passenger when panicked because there’s a terrorist. 

(Source: turnofffox, via stfuhatemongers)

Filed under guns glenn beck is an idiot Glenn Beck TSA airport Airport Airport security Not the best solution here

884 notes

blackenedbutterfly:

dr-grumbles:

kishona:

crystallinebones:

veganatalie:

kittenliberation:

Is this for fucking real?
How is it that Peta, the most well-known “animal rights” organization is the biggest disgrace to the AR community? How fucking dare you laud yourselves as activists. How dareyou use women’s bodies to (allegedly) advocate veganism and anti-cruelty? Are you telling me you care more about the oppression of animals than the oppression of women by the patriarchal system? Do you not see the blatant link between oppressions and slavery? You pride yourselves in aiding the plight of sentient beings. Guess what? WOMEN are sentient beings as well, and we also have rights which shall not be trampled. How cheap of you to use such abhorrent tactics to promote what could be a worthy cause. Also, fat shaming. You worthless piece of shit organization.
Fuck you, Ingrid Newkirk. FUCK YOU.

Picard disapproves, PETA.

 yah i dont like this but you cannot say PETA is a crap organization.  They actually made people aware that there is an issue for animal rights.  they get attention sometimes horrible sexist attention which bugs the hell out of me but i will stand by them because they are the reason i went veg in the first place.  they want to help animals more than anything and i dont think we should shame the freaking hell out of them because they are conforming to 90% of the ads we see on tv and billboards.

Yeah, I dunno, Shannon. :o
I mean, I like what they do for animals, but this isn’t the only sexist ad I’ve seen by them, and I’m sure it won’t be the last…
Isn’t there another big animal rights organization? ^.^;
I apologize in advance for my naivety. xDD

 World Wildlife Fund is a much more friendly organization. I’ve never seen a degrading, sexist, racist ad by them. Someone in the blogosphere please correct me if I’m wrong.

Sorry about this, but PETA kills animals.

I’m not proud of my body scan. It’s not because of any extra weight, but because we’re so goddamn paranoid in this country that we’re willing to subject fellow citizens to this bullshit. It doesn’t work. See here on German TV where it misses bomb components and catches a cell phone.
Anyhow, guess what? It’s not going to see your cute lacy underwear, it’s going to see the full monty. Fuck you PETA, I know fat vegans and skinny carnivores. 

blackenedbutterfly:

dr-grumbles:

kishona:

crystallinebones:

veganatalie:

kittenliberation:

Is this for fucking real?

How is it that Peta, the most well-known “animal rights” organization is the biggest disgrace to the AR community? How fucking dare you laud yourselves as activists. How dareyou use women’s bodies to (allegedly) advocate veganism and anti-cruelty? Are you telling me you care more about the oppression of animals than the oppression of women by the patriarchal system? Do you not see the blatant link between oppressions and slavery? You pride yourselves in aiding the plight of sentient beings. Guess what? WOMEN are sentient beings as well, and we also have rights which shall not be trampled. How cheap of you to use such abhorrent tactics to promote what could be a worthy cause. Also, fat shaming. You worthless piece of shit organization.

Fuck you, Ingrid Newkirk. FUCK YOU.


Picard disapproves, PETA.

 yah i dont like this but you cannot say PETA is a crap organization.  They actually made people aware that there is an issue for animal rights.  they get attention sometimes horrible sexist attention which bugs the hell out of me but i will stand by them because they are the reason i went veg in the first place.  they want to help animals more than anything and i dont think we should shame the freaking hell out of them because they are conforming to 90% of the ads we see on tv and billboards.

Yeah, I dunno, Shannon. :o

I mean, I like what they do for animals, but this isn’t the only sexist ad I’ve seen by them, and I’m sure it won’t be the last…

Isn’t there another big animal rights organization? ^.^;

I apologize in advance for my naivety. xDD

 World Wildlife Fund is a much more friendly organization. I’ve never seen a degrading, sexist, racist ad by them. Someone in the blogosphere please correct me if I’m wrong.

Sorry about this, but PETA kills animals.

I’m not proud of my body scan. It’s not because of any extra weight, but because we’re so goddamn paranoid in this country that we’re willing to subject fellow citizens to this bullshit. It doesn’t work. See here on German TV where it misses bomb components and catches a cell phone.

Anyhow, guess what? It’s not going to see your cute lacy underwear, it’s going to see the full monty. Fuck you PETA, I know fat vegans and skinny carnivores. 

(via bblackenedbutterfly)

Filed under PETA Fuck PETA fatshaming misogyny misogynist fuckery TSA Body scanners Pat downs Paranoia