Posts tagged feminism
Posts tagged feminism
The above document was sent to me by a male reader of my site who’s quite stunned by what he read. I’m not.
They’re fairly organized and are actively calling for articles and research to highlight just how oppressed they are:
"Cite sources that show Leigh Alexander’s EXTREME racism, misandry, and bias towards Intel’s largest consumer-level base (Gamers)… If you have an academic position, tenure, are part of a research group AND have an interest in contributing NEW PAPERS that go against the current Feminist Inquisition…"
DiGRA = Digital Games Research Association.
We all know what consumer base they’re about as well.
But it’s all about ethics in journalism and research, right?
Lots of classy bird aficionados in the askhole tonight. Weird.
After threats against her life, Anita Sarkeesian canceled an upcoming talk at Utah State University. Gamergate trolls are celebrating on Twitter while simultaneously dismissing the threats as nothing. Does this read like nothing to you?
“I will write my manifesto in her spilled blood, and you will all bear witness to what feminist lies and poison have done to the men of America.”
The email’s author threatened to murder feminist women indiscriminately in a mass shooting. And because carrying guns on campus outweigh the right of students and guests to be safe, Anita Sarkeesian canceled her talk.
BUT WE SHOULDN’T FEEL THREATENED, RIGHT?
BECAUSE IT’S JUST THE INTERNET, RIGHT?
The bullies won this time. And if you think this shit isn’t dangerous, I’m fresh out of fucks to give and I’m not restocking any time soon. It’s goddamn wrong to to dismiss this by claiming the author isn’t serious. Elliot Rodger’s rantings were dismissed until it was too late.
This. Is. Not. OK.
This adorable segment pairs Princeton mom and “date rape is mistake sex” pearl-clutcher Susan Patton with Fox News troglodyte and human fart Steve Doocy. And by adorable, I mean horrible.
I just deleted a message I decided I wanted to answer because wine. I deleted four prior from this particular user. However, his gnat-like ravings about selfies tipped the scales.
So here’s the answer to a question I’m not trascribing in its entirety because of its use of homophobic and racist insults towards a woman he identifies by first and last name. Let’s get to the core of this dicknozzle’s multiple “questions” to me over the past three weeks:
You apparently already deactivated your Tumblr, which saddens me. I was going to congratulate you on being the first piece of literal dogshit to learn how to type and navigate the internet after climbing from the primordial ooze of Reddit. Alas, the pressure to perform became too much.
Here’s the answer to your question, fuckwhistle: No.
It’s not hypocritical because in taking a selfie, I am empowering myself and other people who identify as women to put our images out there and control how they appear because in a world that emphasizes we will never be enough, that picture made us feel fabulous. If I got all dolled up, I’m sharing that because I’m goddamn proud. It’s not for your entertainment. I’m taking pride in the way that photo makes me feel.
And are you suggesting that to be feminist is to only post unflattering photos? Or none at all? Because I searched my couch cushions, purses, and pockets and still could not find one single solitary fuck to give about your manchild whines about how we’re “lying” to you with our makeup and flattering Instagram pics. If you’re so batshit deluded that you think I really have ruby red lips, glittery eyelids, and appear only through faux-arty filters named “Amaro” and “Valencia”, that’s not my problem, it’s yours. And your anger about girls who “have pretty pictures but are ugly bitches” is goddamn creepy and smacks of the entitlement you should lose right quick. WE DON’T OWE YOU SHIT, COCKWAGON.
tl;dr — I take selfies for my damn self, and if that irks the fuck out of a whiny wankstain like yourself, that’s just icing on the cake. I’d say kiss my whole butthole, but I don’t want your fedaura within a few hundred feet of me.
I’d say it’s goddamn connected:
"A disturbing video entitled ‘Elliot Rodger’s Retribution’ was posted to YouTube the day before the shooting. In it, a young man who identifies himself as Elliot Rodger describes his plans to launch an assault targeting women at a sorority house as payback for his life of ‘loneliness, rejection, and unfulfilled desires.’
'I will slaughter every stuck up, blonde slut I see inside there … You will finally see that I am in truth the superior one, the true alpha male,' the young man says in the video. He then describes how he plans to 'take to the streets of Isla Vista and slay every single person.'”
The shooter left a YouTube video, which is still up, where he talks of his rejection by women “since puberty” and his desire to punish them for this injustice. He calls himself “a supreme gentlemen” and rants in his BMW about being left a 22-year-old virgin. He talks about how he’s such a nice guy, and that we women throw ourselves at lesser men. And that what happened is the fault of we women — his “revenge against humanity” — because no woman wanted to even date him.
I feel sick. Do not let history be rewritten as him being “crazy” and don’t let the “not all men” crowd hijack this. Yes, most men won’t shoot people because they can’t handle rejection, but HE DID. And his motive is quite clear. This video should be left up as an explanation of the fears we have when a man yells at us and calls us bitches over being friendzoned. When a man follows us outside, after we tell him we’re not interested. When a man makes it clear he is entitled to our bodies. This video is male entitlement at its most terrifying.
Video link — Elliot Rodger’s Retribution
A man tried to burn down an underage girl’s house because she refused his sexual advances.
Not all men get violent when rejected, BUT SOME DO. Before this is hijacked by the “not all men” crowd, can we please think about this for a minute? This is the much more extreme version of feeling entitled to a woman’s body in some way. The softer, more sinister version is calling women bitches because they refused a drink you bought.
It’s catcalling — which is more aptly titled “street harassment” — and telling women to smile on command. It’s calling women sluts for having sex with men who are not you. It’s whining about the friendzone — you were SO NICE and just can’t understand why she won’t fuck you. YOU WERE NICE DAMMIT!
It’s following women down the street for ignoring you. It’s stabbing a classmate to death because she doesn’t want to go to prom with you.
And it’s trying to burn down a teenage girl’s house because you think you’re entitled to fuck her whether she likes it or not.
I just got called a bad feminist for wearing red lipstick. Apparently, it’s inappropriate to want to wear makeup and be a feminist.
Now, I’m sitting here thinking that there’s actual legislative bodies filled with cisgendered straight white men stripping away the rights of others and upholding patriarchal, racist, classist, homophobic, ableist societal institutions, but we’re gonna fight about my goddamn lipstick?
Nope. Take your fauxminist bullshit over to Phyllis Schlafly.
Your reminder of the day #Riotgrrl #feminism
The UK arrests a man for harassing a feminist writer online—why is that so surprising?
S.E. Smith, "On Blogging, Threats, and Silence"
If we don’t talk about it, it doesn’t go away. It just finds another target.
Indeed. #feminism (at UW Take Back the Night 2013)