Cognitive Dissonance

"Democracy! Bah! When I hear that I reach for my feather boa!" - Allen Ginsberg

Posts tagged girls

41 notes

Wait, what’s the point of this show? I don’t get why it’s all brave and groundbreaking and shit. ‘Woo, we’re privileged white people running around Brooklyn! But WITH PROBLEMS! And FAUX POVERTY!’ Please tell me you don’t watch this, Meg, or else I’m embarrassed for you.
Andrew after watching the trailer for the second season of Girls.

Filed under girls lena dunham he's right my husband brings the snark

12 notes

Lena Dunham and her Girls

I’ve had several folks write in to ask what I think of Lena Dunham’s show, Girls, on HBO. Well, I didn’t want to give an opinion until I watched the show and did a little more research.

So I did. And it’s fucking terrible – and not even in an good way. Dunham was called out by several people of color for the show’s lack of diversity and generally self-indulgent characters. Well, those folks are right – it may as well be called White Wine Problems.

Frankly, I was already over Girls when another writer, Lesley Arfin, tweeted a response to criticism by a Black female writer who wrote she tried to like the show, but she didn’t see herself or even NYC’s multiculturalism represented. At all.

Arfin replied that the biggest problem with the movie Precious is that she didn’t see women like herself represented. I know she meant it as a joke, but fucking really?

After watching the show, I get it. Dunham really means that she writes what she knows. And that’s a world of white privilege. Her characters will never be stopped and frisked for no reason. If they are, it’ll be labeled as ironic and uncomfortable, but haha, who cares? Let’s fuck and listen to indie music because we got some real problems.

Dunham, Arfin, and girls like her were represented in that movie, and many others like it. They were present in the systemic oppression of people of color and the consequences thereof.

Hannah (Dunham’s character) whines when her parents cut her off, and steals the money they leave for the maid. This is supposed to be funny or charming or anything but just sickening. If Hannah were not white, it’s unlikely her parents would have much to cut her off from, seeing as non-white families statistically have a fraction of the net worth of white families. There are a multitude of doors open to Hannah and her ilk simply by virtue of their whiteness, which would never exist for a person of color.

The most maddening part about Hannah is that she just doesn’t want to get a job or look for a job.  Basically, she’s the stereotype the GOP points to when they need to talk about lazy GenY-ers needing to get their funding cut for college, health care, etc.

In light of the show’s obstinate obliviousness to race, gender, and sexuality, maybe it’s considerate that her characters are straight, white, privileged women. After all, any character outside of what Dunham knows is likely to receive the one-dimensional treatment of a writer who sticks with what they know versus venturing outside their comfort zone. This IS the show that put out casting notices seeking “ethnic” women to do accents and play nannies. Because that character is totally new, amirite? Stereotypes are a real time-saver!

And God only knows, there’s enough of that kind of bullshit in the media.

Filed under Girls race HBO media Lena Dunham television

10 notes

The Rise of Enlightened Sexism


On The Issues Magazine The Progressive Woman’s Magazine Winter 2011: The Rise of Enlightened Sexism by Susan J. Douglas

Today, we once again have what Betty Friedan famously called “a problem with no name.” Millions of young women — the girl power generation — have been told that they can do or be anything, yet they also believe their most important task is to be slim, “hot,” and non-threatening to men. Once they get out in the work force, though, they learn that there still is pay discrimination, inflexible work places, women slotted into low paying, dead end jobs more often than men and a glass ceiling in so many lines of work.

On The Issues Magazine - Deborah Van Auten, White Light, 2009 oil on linen
© Deborah Van Auten

At the same time, these young women get the message loud and clear that the absolute last thing they should embrace is feminism. Indeed, as one reviews the media landscape of the past 15 years, one is struck by how effectively feminism — a social movement that has done so much for women, and for men, for that matter — has been so vilified in the media that many young women regard it as the ideological equivalent of anthrax. I wanted to trace how that happened, and to pinpoint what it is that remains unspoken but that is still bothering so many of us, to give a name to what’s coursing through our popular culture, this message that you can be or do anything you want, as long as you conform to pretty confining ideals around femininity, and don’t want too much. The name I chose is “Enlightened Sexism” — a term I adapted from Sut Jhally’s and Justin Lewis’s “enlightened racism.” It is a new, subtle, sneaky form of sexism that seems to accept — even celebrate — female achievements on the surface, but is really about repudiating feminism and keeping women, especially young women, in their place.

Click the link above to read the rest of the article. It is so relevant.

Yes, please, read this. It’s amazing. 

(Source: yasalam)

Filed under feminism modernity pop culture girls women feminism is not a dirty word brilliant